The Phrygian Cap


d33p shadow

luisbg

@ubuntu.com

about me

Blogalia
Subscribe with Bloglines

wishlist
amazon.co.uk





bethencourt's Profile Page


<Febrero 2010
Lu Ma Mi Ju Vi Sa Do
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
             

Creative Commons License


planet ubuntu
Silicon Island



"All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree. All these aspirations are directed toward ennobling man's life, lifting it from the sphere of mere physical existence and leading the individual towards freedom." Albert Einstein

decadence: a little less conversation...



... a little more action!

andy wingo, luis villa, havoc pennington, calum benson, jono bacon, alberto ruiz, mikkel kamstrup, rodney dawes, richard hughes, lucas rocha, thomas thurman, owen williams, christian schaller, vincent untz... they all talk about it (and i'm sure i leave people behind), and in general all of them agree. there is a need for change.

the desktop metaphor is obsolete. the objectives behind gnome 2.0 have been fulfilled, but they don't represent anymore the modern desktop needs. the gui as we know it, needs to be redone. there is a need for a new cool generation of visionaire objectives (as the old ones once were).

there already are ideas, i.e. topaz, and most of this ideas came in the wrong time, when there were no infraestructures to embrace them. now there are: clutter, compiz, cairo, pyro, telepathy, etc. what is needed, is action. plus new brainstorm sandboxes are proposed (by owen williams).

as calum benson portrays, we have to stop using this new technologies to mimic and follow behind other developments, we need to unleash their full potential, take benefit of the great community and push them to a higher level, where closed source can't reach.

the desktop only has 3 limitations: the 2 dimension nature of application windows (which eventhough clutter can change, a transition needs to be made), the 2 dimension nature of the screen (which compiz has showed us doesn't limit the desktop), and the operating system nature alberto ruiz points out (which web 3.0, packagekit and metadata developments, like music players, show us can be abstracted).

so... where are the limitations? in the project and not in the technology.

gnome needs a group of pioneers into the 3.0 world. brave people that are willing to lead, code, and experiment towards new ideas and metaphors in the desktop...

i'm in :)

pd: the blog posts thread is getting very complex and hard to track (thanks kamstrup). I propose to move the conversation to a better medium (but not stop making it public through our blogs). gnome 3 mailing list? let's sail with this new breeze of change in the air, and not let it go to waste.

hmmm... probably it's time to join planet gnome.

3 Comentarios


Referencias (TrackBacks)

URL de trackback de esta historia http://luisbg.blogalia.com//trackbacks/57949

Comentarios

1
De: trollenlord Fecha: 2008-06-12 20:37

Add telepathy.



2
De: will_in_wi Fecha: 2008-06-13 01:21

Here is what we need to do. Part 1. Focus of leveraging multitouch displays in ways MS has not thought of. Win7 will be built around the multitouch concept, we need to jump the gun. The first big part of this is to rethink the one user, one login paradigm. Lets create a desktop that can have multiple users on the same screen working on their individual documents.

Part 2, get rid on the existing idea of folders and think of something better. Come up with an intuitive way to easily find a document emailed to me from person x about so long ago. Apple's time machine visualization is a really good start.

The end goal is to stop having to train users. Have the system make so much sense that a user can sit down and do what needs to be done. Another example would be an intelligent word processor. I move around some stuff and the word processor moves the commas around for me. This word processor would analyze the text so that when a word is misspelled, the program would know what the correct word is, not just by what word is closest in spelling, but what word that is closest in spelling fits the context.

Part 3. Translate this blog interface into english. ;-)



3
De: luisbg Fecha: 2008-06-13 12:13

thanks for the comments.
great ideas will.

about the blog interface... this blog engine was coded by a friend some time ago (when no blog engines in spanish existed), so I always think about moving to an other engine but I then think about him :P



Nombre
Correo-e
URL
Dirección IP: 38.107.191.90 (a172c24336)
Comentario

©2007-2009 luis de bethencourt guimerá
Powered by Blogalia