the phrygian cap



Ohloh profile for Luis de Bethencourt

<Mayo 2018
Lu Ma Mi Ju Vi Sa Do
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Creative Commons License

planet gnome
planet ubuntu
alberto ruiz
andy wingo
jeff fortin
slomo's blog
jan schmidt
vincent's random waffle

"all religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree. all these aspirations are directed toward ennobling man's life, lifting it from the sphere of mere physical existence and leading the individual towards freedom." albert einstein

1.0 > vlc > 0.10 > mplayer

Completely unscientific benchmark, just to get you salivating for GStreamer 1.0

X = time, Y = CPU%
gst 0.10 and 0.11 from git, vlc 1.1.12, vlc 2.0.1-0-gf432547, mplayer SVN-r33713-4.6.1
test file: video: H.264 - audio: MPEG-4 AAC

(benchmark created by Wim Taymans)

16 Comentarios

Referencias (TrackBacks)

URL de trackback de esta historia


De: Kant Fecha: 2012-04-12 17:06

Whoa, why does VLC 2 perform so poorly, especially compared to VLC 1? Which codec(s) were tested here?

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2012-04-12 19:46

The problem with vlc2 is related to audio: go to settings>advanced>audio>SRC sampler> and choose another type of sample rate converter...I chose Zero Order'll see a huge cpu usage decrease

De: Tobias Fecha: 2012-04-12 23:53

Can you do that again with a bit of rolling average?

De: Scott M Fecha: 2012-04-13 01:02

However, VLC is the only one in the sample that has a half decent GUI, and that's saying something given how poor it is. So really, all bets are off.

De: Alberto Ruiz Fecha: 2012-04-13 16:19

@Scott M. GStreamer is a platform library not a playback app so your point is mute.

De: Wim Fecha: 2012-04-14 09:49

@Anónimo: Changing the resampler chopped off the tops a little but overal CPU usage is far above old vlc. I also tried enabling VDPAU (through VAAPI), which was even slower (but cpu usage didn't change much in busy vs calm scenes).

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-04-02 00:12

i read a considerable measure of stuff and i found that the method for composing to clearifing that precisely need to say was great so i am inspired and ilike to come back again in future..

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-04-08 23:14

These are some incredible apparatuses that i unquestionably use for SEO work. This is an awesome rundown to use later on.. kebaponalti

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-04-13 12:18

Is it alright to post a portion of this on my site fundamentally present a hyperlink on this site page? cheap postcard printing

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-04-14 23:03

Decent post. I was checking continually this website and I'm awed! Greatly valuable data exceptionally the last part I nurture such data a considerable measure. I was looking for this sure information for quite a while. Much obliged to you and good fortunes. bahis siteleri

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-04-16 13:56

I got what you mean , much obliged for posting .Woh I am glad to discover this site through google. Grammarly

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-04-16 23:37

i read a considerable measure of stuff and i found that the method for composing to clearifing that precisely need to say was great so i am inspired and ilike to come back again in future..

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-05-06 12:23

Companion, this site may be fabolous, i simply like it. who has impacted your life the most and why

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-05-13 10:40

it was a brilliant opportunity to visit this sort of site and I am upbeat to know. much thanks to you such a great amount for allowing us to have this open door.. Pets

De: Anónimo Fecha: 2018-05-15 12:58

much obliged for the tips and information..i truly value it.. her nice essay

De: helpful hints Fecha: 2018-05-22 13:07

Much obliged to you again for all the information you distribute,Good post. I was exceptionally keen on the article, it's entirely rousing I ought to concede. I like going to you site since I generally run over fascinating articles like this one.Great Job, I incredibly acknowledge that.Do Keep sharing! Respects,

Dirección IP: (983fc244f9)
¿Cuánto es: mil + uno?

©2007-2015 luis de bethencourt guimera
powered by Blogalia